202 lines
6.3 KiB
C
202 lines
6.3 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2016 Tobias Brunner
|
|
* HSR Hochschule fuer Technik Rapperswil
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
|
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
|
|
* Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
|
|
* option) any later version. See <http://www.fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.txt>.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
|
|
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY
|
|
* or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
|
* for more details.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include "test_suite.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <daemon.h>
|
|
#include <tests/utils/exchange_test_helper.h>
|
|
#include <tests/utils/exchange_test_asserts.h>
|
|
#include <tests/utils/sa_asserts.h>
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Regular CHILD_SA deletion either initiated by the original initiator or
|
|
* responder of the IKE_SA.
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_regular)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
|
|
|
if (_i)
|
|
{ /* responder deletes the CHILD_SA (SPI 2) */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&b, &a, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{ /* initiator deletes the CHILD_SA (SPI 1) */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, delete_child_sa, PROTO_ESP, _i+1, FALSE);
|
|
assert_child_sa_state(a, _i+1, CHILD_DELETING);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Both peers initiate the CHILD_SA deletion concurrently and should handle
|
|
* the collision properly.
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
/* both peers delete the CHILD_SA concurrently */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, delete_child_sa, PROTO_ESP, 1, FALSE);
|
|
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_DELETING);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, delete_child_sa, PROTO_ESP, 2, FALSE);
|
|
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* RFC 7296 says:
|
|
*
|
|
* Normally, the response in the INFORMATIONAL exchange will contain
|
|
* Delete payloads for the paired SAs going in the other direction.
|
|
* There is one exception. If, by chance, both ends of a set of SAs
|
|
* independently decide to close them, each may send a Delete payload
|
|
* and the two requests may cross in the network. If a node receives a
|
|
* delete request for SAs for which it has already issued a delete
|
|
* request, it MUST delete the outgoing SAs while processing the request
|
|
* and the incoming SAs while processing the response. In that case,
|
|
* the responses MUST NOT include Delete payloads for the deleted SAs,
|
|
* since that would result in duplicate deletion and could in theory
|
|
* delete the wrong SA.
|
|
*
|
|
* We don't handle SAs separately so we expect both are still installed,
|
|
* but the INFORMATIONAL response should not contain a DELETE payload.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_DELETING);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { } */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* This is like the collision above but one of the DELETEs is dropped or delayed
|
|
* so the other peer is not aware that there is a collision.
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_drop)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
|
message_t *msg;
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
/* both peers delete the CHILD_SA concurrently */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, delete_child_sa, PROTO_ESP, 1, FALSE);
|
|
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_DELETING);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, delete_child_sa, PROTO_ESP, 2, FALSE);
|
|
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* drop/delay the responder's message */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { } */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } (delayed/retransmitted) */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, msg);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
Suite *child_delete_suite_create()
|
|
{
|
|
Suite *s;
|
|
TCase *tc;
|
|
|
|
s = suite_create("child delete");
|
|
|
|
tc = tcase_create("regular");
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_regular, 0, 2);
|
|
suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
|
|
|
|
tc = tcase_create("collisions");
|
|
tcase_add_test(tc, test_collision);
|
|
tcase_add_test(tc, test_collision_drop);
|
|
suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
|
|
|
|
return s;
|
|
}
|