To quickly check out IKE_SAs and find associated CHILD_SAs, the
child_sa_manager stores relations between CHILD_SAs and IKE_SAs. It provides
CHILD_SA specific IKE_SA checkout functions wrapping the ike_sa_manager.
As we now use the same reqid for multiple CHILD_SAs with the same selectors,
having marks based on the reqid makes not that much sense anymore. Instead we
use unique marks that use a custom identifier. This identifier is reused during
rekeying, keeping the marks constant for any rule relying on it (for example
installed by updown).
This also simplifies handling of reqid allocation, as we do not have to query
the marks that is not yet assigned for an unknown reqid.
The kernel backend uses an inbound parameter these days, where it makes
no sense to pass the update flag. The kernel backend decides itself how
it handles SA installation based on the inbound flag.
While we can handle the first selector only in BEET mode in kernel-netlink,
passing the full list gives the backend more flexibility how to handle this
information.
The reqid is not strictly required, as we set the reqid with the update
call when installing the negotiated SA.
If we don't need a reqid at this stage, we can later allocate the reqid in
the kernel backend once the SA parameters have been fully negotaited. This
allows us to assign the same reqid for the same selectors to avoid conflicts
on backends this is necessary.
While they usually are not included in a normal strongSwan build, the XPC
header indirectly defines these Mach types. To build charon-xpc, which uses
both XPC and strongSwan includes, we have to redefine these types.
We currently send the notify in Main Mode only, as it is explicitly not allowed
by RFC 2407 to send (unprotected) notifications in Aggressive Mode. To make
that work, we'd need to handle that notify in Aggressive Mode, which could
allow a MitM to inject such notifies and do some harm.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Egerer <thomas.egerer@secunet.com>
We assume that a responder is behind a static NAT (e.g. port forwarding)
and allow remote address updates in such situations.
The problem described in RFC 5996 is only an issue if the NAT mapping
can expire.
I still think ipsec/l2tp with fragmentation support is a useful
fallback option in case the Windows IKEv2 connection fails because
of fragmentation problems.
Tested with Windows XP, 7 and 8.1.
For instance, if a DPD exchange is initiated by the gateway when a
mobile client is roaming and it then gets a new IP address and sends
an address update via MOBIKE, the DPD retransmits would still be sent
to the old address and the SA would eventually get closed.
The message() hook on bus_t is now called exactly once before (plain) and
once after fragmenting (!plain), not twice for the complete message and again
for each individual fragment, as was the case in earlier iterations.
For inbound messages the hook is called once for each fragment (!plain)
and twice for the reassembled message.
At the time we reset an IKE_SA (e.g. when re-authenticating a not yet
established SA due to a roaming event) such tasks might already be queued
by one of the phase 1 tasks. If the SA is initiated again another task will
get queued by the phase 1 task. This results in e.g. multiple mode config
requests, which most gateways will have problems with.
This reverts commit 3293d14628.
The position of tasks in the queue does not actually determine the order
in which they are activated. Instead this is determined by the
statements in task_manager_v2_t.initiate().
Martin Willi