Similar to the previous commit. Instead of
generating rule 10 (1258)
followed by (or not if the list is empty)
generating payload of type PROPOSAL_SUBSTRUCTURE
we now get
generating rule 10 LIST of PROPOSAL_SUBSTRUCTURE
in the debug log.
Instead of this
parsing rule 10 (1258)
we now see this
parsing rule 10 LIST of PROPOSAL_SUBSTRUCTURE
in the debug log. Particularly useful if the list is empty as there won't
be a message like this following it:
x bytes left, parsing recursively PROPOSAL_SUBSTRUCTURE
This is particularly important for IKE_SAs that are not yet established,
which would get terminated as they have no established CHILD_SAs yet.
Fixes: 72f9a21b22 ("Merge branch 'vici-reload-actions'")
Otherwise, all configs would be considered to even some degree as the
ports usually match.
Closesstrongswan/strongswan#2441
Fixes: 9228a5109b ("ike-cfg: Consider port information in IKE config match")
Previously, it could happen that child_rekey() was triggered twice for
the same "old" SA. For listeners that would mean they'd loose track as
they'd be tracking a new SA that wasn't relevant anymore and for which
no updown event would ever get triggered (it was the redundant SA in a
collision). This new assert ensures that events are triggered in a
predictable way and listeners can track SAs properly.
As the winner of a rekey collision, we previously always triggered the
child_rekey() event once when creating the redundant SA on behalf of the
peer in the passive child-rekey task and then a second time when
creating the winning SA in the active task. However, both calls passed
the replaced CHILD_SA as "old". This made tracking CHILD_SAs impossible
because there was no transition from the redundant, "new" SA of the
first event to the "new", winning SA of the second. Of course, when the
second event was triggered, the redundant SA might not have existed
anymore because the peer is expected to delete it, which could happen
before the CREATE_CHILD_SA response arrives at the initiator.
This refactoring ensures that the child_rekey() event is triggered in
a way that makes the CHILD_SAs trackable in all reasonable (and even
some unreasonable) scenarios. The event is generally only triggered
once after installing the outbound SA for the new/winning CHILD_SA.
This can be when processing the CREATE_CHILD_SA in the active child-rekey
task, or when processing the DELETE for the old SA in a passive
child-delete task. There are some cases where the event is still
triggered twice, but it is now ensured that listeners can properly
transition to the winning SA.
Some corner cases are now also handled correctly, e.g. if a responder's
DELETE for the new CHILD_SA arrives before its CREATE_CHILD_SA response
that actually creates it on the initiator. Also handled properly are
responders of rekeyings that incorrectly send a DELETE for the old
CHILD_SA (previously this caused both, the new and the old SA, to get
deleted).
It also changes that payloads are built before installing the CHILD_SA
on the responder, that is, the KE payload is generated before keys are
derived, so that key_exchange_t::get_public_key() is called before
get_shared_secret(), or its internal equivalent, which could be relevant
for KE implementations that want to ensure that the key can't be
accessed again after the key derivation.
Initially, this is handled with a key derivation for each
IKE_INTERMEDIATE exchange. When rekeying, the keys are derived only
once all IKE_FOLLOWUP_KE exchanges are done.
The message ID of the first IKE_AUTH exchange is a safe-guard against
potential truncation attacks if IKE_INTERMEDIATE exchanges are not used
for multiple key exchanges but some other future use where the number of
exchanges might not depend on the selected proposal.
We currently only support these exchanges for additional key exchanges,
so once we have the final keys derived and the ike-init task is removed,
we don't expect any more of them.
The kernel now allows a 0 replay window with ESN for SAs that are
explicitly tagged as outbound SAs. But not just that, it actually
rejects outbound SAs with replay windows > 0. So we add a version check
to control the replay window size. Note that adding the attribute
unconditionally would be fine even for older kernels, but if somebody
backports the direction patches, the installation of outbound SAs might
fail if the replay window is not adjusted accordingly.
Tobias Brunner